.avif)
.jpg)
How do you convince an immigration officer that you're not just a skilled professional, but a star in your field? One of the most powerful tools is a strong public profile: expert publications, media interviews, participation in competitions and professional associations. In this guide, we’ll break down how to systematically build visibility to improve your chances for the O‑1 or EB‑1 visa — and strengthen your professional reputation in the process.
Many highly qualified professionals from Russia and the CIS underestimate the importance of personal publicity. “I have a strong resume, my colleagues value me, and I’ve had success at work — why would I need publicity?” This is a common question among prospective O‑1 and EB‑1 applicants. The answer is simple: a public profile matters not just for the immigration officer, but for you as a professional. Visibility in your field increases your market value — if people can find you on Google in two clicks, you earn more trust from partners and employers, and expand your network. In today’s world, a specialist without an active LinkedIn profile virtually “doesn’t exist” professionally — especially if they plan to build a career abroad. This applies not only to the tech industry, but also to creative fields, sports, and academia. Producers, athletes, musicians — everyone needs a digital footprint and media presence.
The U.S. O‑1A non-immigrant visa and the EB‑1A immigrant visa (green card) are designed for individuals with extraordinary ability in science, business, sports, the arts, and other areas. To qualify for the O‑1A, a candidate must meet at least 3 out of 8 “extraordinary ability” criteria; for the EB‑1A, it's 3 out of 10. While the full list is extensive, several criteria are directly tied to your public profile:
U.S. immigration authorities want to see that you’re not just a good specialist, but widely recognized in your field. Presence in the media and other public platforms serves as independent validation of your accomplishments — a kind of endorsement from your industry. Put simply, when an officer sees articles about you in reputable outlets, it signals that your achievements are acknowledged not just by your coworkers, but by the broader professional community.
In a professional context, your public profile is largely built around publications. For visa cases, two main types of media presence are considered essential:
These are materials where you are the subject — a journalist interviews you, writes a profile about your projects, or includes your expert commentary with a focus on your unique perspective. The goal is to highlight your personal contribution, the scale of your work, and your key achievements. Your name, position, and accomplishments (e.g. increased company profits by X%, won a major competition, created an innovative product) must be clearly mentioned. For example, if you're an entrepreneur, the interview might cover the story of your business and what made it successful; if you're a scientist — the significance of your research discovery.
It’s important to choose the right angle: the publication should emphasize you, not just advertise your company. Avoid mentioning immigration or visas — the focus should be solely on your career and expertise. These types of materials match the “Published material about you” criterion in USCIS terminology.
The second type includes articles you write yourself (or co-author) for reputable media. These could be featured in major industry outlets — not just academic journals. Here, you act as an expert sharing your knowledge. Formats vary: an analytical article on industry trends, a how-to guide, an opinion column, or a scientific paper.
Such content demonstrates the depth of your expertise. It’s not about your biography, but rather about the value of your insights. For instance, a marketing executive might write “10 Trends in Marketing for 2025” for a professional journal; an AI developer could publish a technical breakdown on Towards Data Science; a researcher might submit findings to an academic journal. These authorial publications fulfill the “Authorship of scholarly articles” criterion for the O‑1/EB‑1 visas.
Both types of publications are recommended. Interviews confirm public recognition, while expert articles demonstrate your intellectual or practical contribution. Together, they create a well-rounded image: you’re both talked about and quoted. According to immigration lawyers, a solid visa case should include about 6–10 publications — ideally 3–5 of each type. What matters most is not the number of mentions, but the reach, credibility, and consistency of your media presence.
This raises a key question: which media outlets are best suited for visa-related publications? Should you take every opportunity, or focus on high-profile sources?
The answer: the quality and relevance of the outlet are far more important than the sheer number of mentions. USCIS uses the phrase “major media” — meaning they expect at least some of your articles to appear in high-profile or professionally significant platforms.
The definition of “major” is relative. Not everyone will land in the New York Times — and that’s fine. National and industry-specific outlets also count, as long as they are influential in your field.
For example, a publication in TechCrunch that garners strong traction is great for someone in IT; for a scientist — a leading academic journal; for an architect — a renowned design portal. But an article on an obscure website with only 1,000 monthly visitors likely won’t impress an immigration officer.
You can check its audience using tools like SimilarWeb: if a site receives hundreds of thousands or millions of visitors per month, that’s a solid indicator. Also look at its reputation — does it rank among top media sources in your country? Is it cited by other publications?
When submitting your case, you’ll typically include a media summary: when the outlet was founded, its niche, readership stats, rankings, etc. That’s why you should aim for platforms you won’t be embarrassed to describe as “the leading business news site in the country, with 500,000 unique monthly visitors.”
If the platform is niche, be ready to explain its relevance and status in detail.
Tip: Start with the top 5–10 outlets in your field and region. For a tech entrepreneur from Russia, good targets might include RBC, VC.ru, Rusbase, Forbes Russia, or Hi-Tech — especially for startup-focused topics. For scientists — field-specific journals, or popular science platforms like Scientific American or National Geographic. Don’t limit yourself to Russian-language media: if you’re comfortable writing in English, try international outlets. Many global media are interested in foreign expert perspectives on emerging markets. A Russian analyst might publish a piece in TechCrunch about Eastern Europe’s tech scene or give an interview to an Asian business site — these cases have already happened. A geographically diverse publication history is even better: it shows your expertise has global relevance.
Naturally, not everyone can land a piece in Forbes right away. If you’re just starting your media journey, it’s fine to begin with smaller outlets — but don’t dip too low. A regional business publication with 100,000 readers is a solid start; a personal blog on Medium with a few hundred views may seem weak in a visa context.
Also consider audience fit: the media should be relevant to your professional niche. An interview in a glossy lifestyle magazine like Tatler might suit an artist, but would likely be considered irrelevant for a software engineer.
Absolutely no “Sponsored” labels! It’s easy to pay for a feature article. But paid content is not admissible in a visa case. It does not prove independent recognition — and if an officer detects that the piece is sponsored, it will be discounted. Bottom line: focus only on editorial (non-sponsored) content in credible media relevant to your field.
Let’s say you’ve identified the media outlets you’d like to be published in and figured out what stories you could share. What’s next? Time to actively engage with journalists — this process is known as pitching. Here are several practical steps to make it work:
Journalists need stories or ideas that will interest their readers. Analyze current trends in your field. For example, if AI is dominating the conversation in tech — can you comment on how it’s affecting your industry? If you work in marketing and have a case study on growing a business during a downturn — that could be relevant. Come up with 2–3 topics where you can provide valuable insights. These should be broad and timely enough to appeal to the media’s audience but still highlight your personal expertise. No need to write the full article right away — just prepare a few ideas and clear talking points.
Look into each target outlet to find the person who covers your topic. Most sites have section pages listing authors. If you see that RBC’s tech business articles are written by Alena Ivanova — that’s likely the journalist you should contact. Read a few of her articles to understand her style and focus. A personalized pitch to the right person is far more effective than a generic message to “info@...” addresses. Personalization is key.
Introduce yourself and get to the point quickly. A good email subject might be: “Will AI Replace Programmers? Insights from the CTO of Company X.” This creates intrigue and establishes your expert role — increasing the likelihood that the email will be opened. In 2–3 short paragraphs, explain who you are and why you’re worth covering (mention your experience and achievements briefly), what topics you can speak to, and why they’re relevant to that outlet’s audience. Avoid vague or self-promotional statements like “I’m amazing and can talk about anything.” Instead, be precise: “I’m a software engineer with 10+ years in AI, led projects that achieved X and Y, and I can offer insights on Z, which I believe would resonate with your readers because…” Your message should fit on one phone screen and make the value clear right away.
Depending on the outlet, you can offer either an interview or an authored column. If you’re confident in your writing skills, offer to draft an article (and be prepared to meet editorial guidelines). If you'd prefer answering questions, indicate that you’re open to being interviewed. Example: “I can write a 1,000-word expert column on Topic X or provide extended commentary for a piece on Topic Y.” Let the journalist decide what works best. Be sure to mention your flexibility — “If you’re exploring related topics, I’d be happy to contribute insights on those as well.” Don’t make the journalist figure out how you might fit — explain it clearly.
Use your professional email address, include your title and contact info in the signature, and link to your LinkedIn or portfolio — a journalist will likely Google you. If you don’t hear back after a few days, a polite follow-up via the same thread or LinkedIn is acceptable. Many journalists are open to DMs. Be polite and unobtrusive: the editorial team might be planning to cover your topic later. And never blast the same pitch to dozens of outlets — media professionals talk, and seeing the same email all over might hurt your credibility. It’s better to proceed one by one: offer an exclusive to one outlet, wait for a response, and if none comes, try another, slightly adapting your pitch.
Once a publication is confirmed, make sure to deliver value. If it’s an interview — prepare thoughtfully, have data and examples ready to back up your points. If you’re writing a column — consider working with a copywriter or editor. Don’t hesitate to get help: your goal is to shine as an expert, not a wordsmith. Your thoughts should be your own, but polishing the delivery is fine. Adapt to the platform: mainstream media might need a simpler tone, while niche outlets expect more technical detail. Respect any word limits, formatting, and deadlines.
When the piece goes live, save all relevant documentation: links, screenshots with the publication name, date, and author. For your visa case, you’ll need copies of the articles and translations if they’re in another language. It’s also a good idea to gather info about the media outlet itself (unless it’s something like The New York Times): traffic, authority, reputation. Consider saving a copy via the Web Archive in case the site later removes the content. For reputable media, this usually isn’t an issue.
All of this takes time and effort, especially if you’re new to media outreach. PR agencies can handle pitching on your behalf — they often have existing media relationships. Working with professionals speeds up the process: an experienced PR specialist can sometimes land your first publication within 2–3 weeks of collaboration.
In addition to publications, many O‑1/EB‑1 applicants aim to meet the judging criterion. At first glance, this raises many questions: “Where can I become a judge? No one’s inviting me…” In reality, there are more opportunities than it seems — you just need to actively look for them and not be afraid to propose yourself.
The meaning of the criterion is this: you must demonstrate that your opinion is valued in the industry enough that you’re invited to evaluate the work of others. This confirms your status as an authority. Importantly, judging means assessing the work of your professional peers, not subordinates. For example, if your job involves reviewing your team’s projects or you’re a teacher grading students — this doesn’t meet the criterion. But serving on the jury of a startup competition — does.
Think of what events happen in your field. These could be professional awards, industry competitions, hackathons, exhibitions, startup accelerator selections, scientific conferences with contests for young researchers, sports tournaments, etc. Organizers of such events often look for additional judges or experts, especially for large-scale events. Sometimes it’s enough to write to the organizers, present your expertise, and offer your services. Show what makes you valuable: list your experience, publications (your previous profile-building work will come in handy here — one thing supports another). Yes, it requires proactivity: you’ll need to take the initiative.
As with publications, every judging activity must be documented. Save the invitation (email or official offer), take screenshots of webpages where your name appears on the jury list, download event programs. If the judging was online — for example, you evaluated projects via a platform — take screenshots of the interface showing your account and the participants' entries, or ask the organizers for confirmation letters. Often you’ll receive a certificate or letter of appreciation for being on the jury — make sure to get those. Ideally, also request a recommendation letter from the organizers stating why you were invited and what work you did.
It’s better to judge multiple events.
Formally, one competition may be enough to meet the criterion. But in practice, it’s common to provide 2–3 judging examples — this adds more weight. In fact, participating in one jury can lead to invitations to others: you might get noticed and invited again next year, for example. Two competitions in different years is even better — it shows sustained recognition.
The criteria “published material about you” and “judging” are the most obvious where public visibility plays a key role. But don’t forget other related activities that should also be part of your profile-building strategy:
Building a strong public profile is meticulous work. Here's what not to do — so you don’t waste time or accidentally harm your case:
Building a strong public profile is a strategic task. You need to plan which achievements to highlight, which criteria they support, and systematically work through that plan. Often, during an initial visa consultation, it becomes clear where a candidate lacks visibility. For example, a lawyer might say: “You have strong awards and high income, but not enough publications — let’s focus on media and judging.” Knowing this in advance helps you allocate effort effectively.
If it feels overwhelming or you lack time — consider working with PR professionals. At Relogate, we partner with top PR agencies specializing in public profile development for immigration cases. They’ll help create a personalized plan: which stories to pitch, which outlets to target, what conferences to speak at, and which judging opportunities to pursue. They’ll handle outreach, article preparation, and event coordination. This way, you’ll build a strong, visible profile — significantly boosting your chances of securing an O‑1 visa or EB‑1A green card. Ultimately, your public brand will shine — opening doors not just in immigration, but in your entire career.
.avif)
